This may be long, but you might agree.

Hey Bemani lovers, how is everyone?
Ahh…I see. Well, I have something I’d like to say today. By all means, if you don’t want to read it, you don’t have to and I won’t think less of you for it. But I have not posted anything here in these forums yet and I think it might be time that I do.
First off, I do want to say it’s nice to see some of you around and I’m glad that everyone is well. I haven’t talked to a lot of you since, oh…the Neon fm days, but I am happy there are some core people in the community who have stuck around to help hold it afloat. So, in summary, Nice to see some veterans around.
Now, on to the matter at hand. I was chosen to be a judge for bracket 1 by Bluess and as such, I spent a great deal of time writing reviews for said bracket (9 hours). In Microsoft Word, it was roughly 20 pages of text I had slapped down with a lengthy and detailed review for each step chart for each song. Yes, I wrote about a paragraph of review for each step chart for each song and of course, I also wrote a paragraph for the presentation and even went so far as to add a “personal comments” afterthought about the files at the end. In the personal comments section I included my thoughts on everything as a whole but would mainly address concerns/opinions that we weren’t allowed to actually put judgment on. For example, I would tackle the interpretations of the art, song length/edit or even song choice itself. Anyways, I did the best I could to be as thorough as possible for the benefit of the competition and the entrants.
As it turns out, my entire judging sheet was thrown out the window because Bluess disagreed with me on a few of my judgments. He claimed that I had given “9000 Remix” a higher score than I gave “The Eleventh Hour.” This part is most certainly true. He then asked me ‘why’ (a fair question) and as such, I responded in the best way that I could. I informed him that I play all the files on my feet as well as my hands (I have a nice cobalt flux steel setup) and I base my judging on playing between the two for each file. Yes, for the record, that does mean I played every chart more than once. I then went on to tell him that it was impossible for me to get very far into Eleventh Hour and even on my fingers, the song wasn’t very fun. To witness the entire entry for fair judging, I wound up putting Stepmania on auto play and I sat back for a “wild ride.” After watching the charts, I came to the conclusion that I was very funny and I found it to be a “classic joke entry.” I actually laughed out loud for that one, but because it wasn’t funny AND fun, I didn’t give it any points.
Earlier in the rules, it was clearly noted that this was a DDR step file contest, and not “Pump”, “In The Groove” or even a “Neon fm” step file contest (but maybe I'll hold one of those). The songs were to be a DDR length edit, no hand plants were requested, as well as no mines. This was all part of the rules setup that lead into the Best Mix Tournament. I used these rules to help justify my decisions to Bluess as best I could, but it didn’t work so well. He then accused me of being biased and not giving songs appropriate scores. I then told him that he should go read the rest of the reviews because I thought he was judging me on one file he disagreed with. Unfortunately, I appeared to be correct when he further accused me of being biased because my “personal comments” sections seemed to influence my overall judging. Well, as you may or may not know, I went to great lengths to make sure that I judged files on the criteria previously stated and not anything else. So, with my natural curiosity, I asked Bluess to find an example in my review sheet of which he was referring, and kindly point me in that direction so we could nip this in the bud. His example was my “personal comments” on the song entry “Dark Blue.” He pointed out that I didn’t like the song choice there and then (again) accused me of using that information to make a judgment in which I wasn’t supposed to. Well, for the record, that file received great reviews from me. It got 9/10 in it’s heavy steps alone, and near perfect scores in the other categories judged. So (naturally) I failed to see how my dislike of the song choice in personal comments altered the judging in some negative way, and when I brought this to the attention of Bluess, he had no retort at the ready. Actually, I think that killed most of the conversation.
Sorry this is so long, but I’ll go ahead and wrap this up since I’m sure you’re tired of hearing me blather on and on. My point here is just that I thought (and I could be wrong) that having multiple judges was to obtain multiple opinions so that a medium could be reached to determine an “all around” greatness of each file. I personally feel that the point of judges was to get as many differing opinions as possible so that things could be tallied up. Like I said, I could be wrong, but I’m pretty sure that just getting 4 or 5 judges to all have the same opinions defeats the point of judging in the first place. It just seems rather counter productive. All in all, I do want to say that this “Best Mix” has been rather disappointing on the whole, and I’m not just saying that because I dislike Bluess or anything. I think Bluess is just fine as far as human beings go, but for another tournament of step files, I think a new “leader” should be named. Mayhaps a vote would work? But only if everyone’s opinions are different.
Thanks for reading and again, I hope everyone is well. Best of luck to all who participated in Best Mix.
-DJ Potatoe
P.S. Bluess said he would post my “denied” judge sheet on the boards in case you folks want to read the massive amounts of feedback I tried to produce. If he doesn’t, maybe you can pm him for a copy.
Ahh…I see. Well, I have something I’d like to say today. By all means, if you don’t want to read it, you don’t have to and I won’t think less of you for it. But I have not posted anything here in these forums yet and I think it might be time that I do.
First off, I do want to say it’s nice to see some of you around and I’m glad that everyone is well. I haven’t talked to a lot of you since, oh…the Neon fm days, but I am happy there are some core people in the community who have stuck around to help hold it afloat. So, in summary, Nice to see some veterans around.

Now, on to the matter at hand. I was chosen to be a judge for bracket 1 by Bluess and as such, I spent a great deal of time writing reviews for said bracket (9 hours). In Microsoft Word, it was roughly 20 pages of text I had slapped down with a lengthy and detailed review for each step chart for each song. Yes, I wrote about a paragraph of review for each step chart for each song and of course, I also wrote a paragraph for the presentation and even went so far as to add a “personal comments” afterthought about the files at the end. In the personal comments section I included my thoughts on everything as a whole but would mainly address concerns/opinions that we weren’t allowed to actually put judgment on. For example, I would tackle the interpretations of the art, song length/edit or even song choice itself. Anyways, I did the best I could to be as thorough as possible for the benefit of the competition and the entrants.
As it turns out, my entire judging sheet was thrown out the window because Bluess disagreed with me on a few of my judgments. He claimed that I had given “9000 Remix” a higher score than I gave “The Eleventh Hour.” This part is most certainly true. He then asked me ‘why’ (a fair question) and as such, I responded in the best way that I could. I informed him that I play all the files on my feet as well as my hands (I have a nice cobalt flux steel setup) and I base my judging on playing between the two for each file. Yes, for the record, that does mean I played every chart more than once. I then went on to tell him that it was impossible for me to get very far into Eleventh Hour and even on my fingers, the song wasn’t very fun. To witness the entire entry for fair judging, I wound up putting Stepmania on auto play and I sat back for a “wild ride.” After watching the charts, I came to the conclusion that I was very funny and I found it to be a “classic joke entry.” I actually laughed out loud for that one, but because it wasn’t funny AND fun, I didn’t give it any points.
Earlier in the rules, it was clearly noted that this was a DDR step file contest, and not “Pump”, “In The Groove” or even a “Neon fm” step file contest (but maybe I'll hold one of those). The songs were to be a DDR length edit, no hand plants were requested, as well as no mines. This was all part of the rules setup that lead into the Best Mix Tournament. I used these rules to help justify my decisions to Bluess as best I could, but it didn’t work so well. He then accused me of being biased and not giving songs appropriate scores. I then told him that he should go read the rest of the reviews because I thought he was judging me on one file he disagreed with. Unfortunately, I appeared to be correct when he further accused me of being biased because my “personal comments” sections seemed to influence my overall judging. Well, as you may or may not know, I went to great lengths to make sure that I judged files on the criteria previously stated and not anything else. So, with my natural curiosity, I asked Bluess to find an example in my review sheet of which he was referring, and kindly point me in that direction so we could nip this in the bud. His example was my “personal comments” on the song entry “Dark Blue.” He pointed out that I didn’t like the song choice there and then (again) accused me of using that information to make a judgment in which I wasn’t supposed to. Well, for the record, that file received great reviews from me. It got 9/10 in it’s heavy steps alone, and near perfect scores in the other categories judged. So (naturally) I failed to see how my dislike of the song choice in personal comments altered the judging in some negative way, and when I brought this to the attention of Bluess, he had no retort at the ready. Actually, I think that killed most of the conversation.
Sorry this is so long, but I’ll go ahead and wrap this up since I’m sure you’re tired of hearing me blather on and on. My point here is just that I thought (and I could be wrong) that having multiple judges was to obtain multiple opinions so that a medium could be reached to determine an “all around” greatness of each file. I personally feel that the point of judges was to get as many differing opinions as possible so that things could be tallied up. Like I said, I could be wrong, but I’m pretty sure that just getting 4 or 5 judges to all have the same opinions defeats the point of judging in the first place. It just seems rather counter productive. All in all, I do want to say that this “Best Mix” has been rather disappointing on the whole, and I’m not just saying that because I dislike Bluess or anything. I think Bluess is just fine as far as human beings go, but for another tournament of step files, I think a new “leader” should be named. Mayhaps a vote would work? But only if everyone’s opinions are different.

Thanks for reading and again, I hope everyone is well. Best of luck to all who participated in Best Mix.

-DJ Potatoe
P.S. Bluess said he would post my “denied” judge sheet on the boards in case you folks want to read the massive amounts of feedback I tried to produce. If he doesn’t, maybe you can pm him for a copy.