Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 2:26 pm
Wellian wrote:Most of all, I feel my file is doing its job quite nicely.
OMG VODKA????!!!LL!L!?!?!?!
I know you made that file just to get us all drunk so we would argue. You can't hide it anymore!
Revival of the Pre-DDR X Style Simfile Tournament
http://best-mix.net/forum/
Wellian wrote:Most of all, I feel my file is doing its job quite nicely.
Titiln wrote:5/5 incredibly useful would read again
Xythar wrote:Titiln wrote:5/5 incredibly useful would read again
4/10 overly short and catchphrase heavy; please try harder next time
Wellian wrote:Xythar wrote:Titiln wrote:5/5 incredibly useful would read again
4/10 overly short and catchphrase heavy; please try harder next time
8/10 revived entertaining time-wasting concept; may not please all forum admins though
alphabet55 wrote:(Sorry to break the chain...)
Ok, here's the deal: Every review I read, the first thing I think is... are they really that bad?
I mean, it seems like 75% of the entries are getting less than 6 points. Sure, a few are breaking away from the group, but these few seem to be different for every reviewer.
Oh well, I hope/am thankful that my entry does/is doing well (whether or not it's already out, you'll never know).
Titiln wrote:2/10 oh god not this shit again
Lisek wrote:And most of files get those low notes because of presentation (which is 4 points for double charts, extras and graphichs).
will-i-am wrote:NOTE TO ALL REVIEWERS:
PRESENTATION IS NOT BASED ONLY ON GRAPHICS AND EXTRAS!!!
Did you reviewers even bother to read the judging scale??? When judging presentation, you must remember that it's based on the file as a whole. You can't just say, "ZOMG AMAZIN' STEPCHARTZZZ! 6/6" and then write, "The graphics were terrible 0/4". In the judging rules, BLueSS specifically stated that when judging a file, there are 2 examples that pretty much sum up how to judge a simfile's presentation:BLueSS wrote:To Illustrate the point:
Ex 1: A well-polished simfile by someone with experience gets a full score because it's on-sync, has excellent graphics, superb steps, and is a great song for DDR. It does not have any extras aside from a cd-title.
Ex 2: A simfile by another artist who isn't good at graphics deserves a full score because the animated graphics make up for the okay regular ones, as well an an additional chart or doubles, or something else.
Presentation doesn't mean extras, which is exactly why this year it's called "PRESENTATION". It's not fair if a simfile has amazing steps but is deducted points just because he/she can't make amazing graphics. Also to note, if a file has decent steps and the extras make up for them, they file should get full presentation points, which I don't see as being the problem since everyone is taking the presentation area of judging as graphics/extras.
The new judging system was made for a very important reason: TO MAKE JUDGING A MORE FAIR AND FRIENDLY PROCESS. Let's try to keep it that way.
BLueSS wrote:will-i-am wrote:PRESENTATION IS NOT BASED ONLY ON GRAPHICS AND EXTRAS!!!
Truth is spoken.
Lisek wrote:1~2 - very bad file, dunno why it is here.
3~5 - bad file, but fixed can be really better.
6~8 - good file, normal quality file.
9 - very good file, high-quality or even top 5 file.
10 - SUPER!, the file which probably will win.
alphabet55 wrote:"Wow, will anyone not get full points for presentation?"
Lisek wrote:And most of files get those low notes because of presentation (which is 4 points for double charts, extras and graphichs).